Showing posts with label SQUIRMING LIBERAL APOLOGISTS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SQUIRMING LIBERAL APOLOGISTS. Show all posts

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Stupid "Liberal" Apologist Tricks



Here's one for the SQUIRMING LIBERAL APOLOGISTS file

Seems that five High School students in the Bay Area were ordered home on Cinco de Mayo by their Principal for insensitivity to Mexican students. The Offending conduct: Wearing American Flag bandannas and Tee-Shirts.

Read the nauseating stupidity here

I smell a non-frivolous lawsuit!

UPDATE



Ran at Si Vis Pacem has honored me with a "Post Title Excellence" prize for this post. Ran: I'm deeply grateful for the nod!

For any who don't regularly stop by Ran's site, you do yourselves a great disservice.




Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Fear and Loathing in Liberaldom - or, How to Provoke an Islamist Attack

From Ralph Peters - New York Post


I couldn't possibly say this more succinctly myself. Bravo Ralph!

h/t to Sammy Benoit at YidWithLid


The smell of our fear

Last Updated: 12:34 AM, May 5, 2010

Posted: 11:32 PM, May 4, 2010

Appeasement doesn't work. It doesn't work with dictators, and it doesn't work with terrorists. The attempted Times Square bombing was yet more proof.

We've allowed Islamist extremists to dictate what we can say, print or portray. We don't want to offend them. The First Amendment bows before Islam.

The Obama administration has ducked all unwelcome evidence that such appeasement doesn't work. Instead, it goes to absurd lengths to convince Muslim radicals that we respect their views.

Our counterfactual assumption is that, if we're really, really nice, the fanatics will stop being grumpy and blowing us up. But Islamist extremists haven't read our actions (or inactions) as an admirable exercise in tolerance. They read our bowing and scraping and apologizing as weakness.

The mean-dog law applies: Let that pit bull sense that you're afraid, and you're going to feel its teeth.

Instead of applauding our ecumenical decency, terrorists just smell fear.

So we've had yet another attempt to ignite an inferno in the heart of Manhattan, to slaughter the innocent and teach America a lesson.

Since the Obama administration deepened our submissive attitude toward Islam -- banning all references to "Islamist terror" or "Muslim radicalism" from government documents and statements -- the number of terror attacks on our soil has gone up. Does any reader believe this is just a coincidence?

The dogs of terror smell fear. Terror's response to our president's Cairo valentine to fanaticism last year was the Fort Hood massacre, the attempted Christmas Day bombing, now the botched bombing of Times Square -- and a swelling number of foiled plots.

The Times Square near-miss was particularly revealing. When it looked like the bomber might be a forty-something white male, the media's delight and the relief of our politicians was palpable: At last, another Timothy McVeigh! It isn't only Muslims!

Boo-hoo. The perp turned out to be another Islamist terrorist we can't call an "Islamist terrorist."

Now the question of most interest about the terrorists' latest Manhattan Project is whether Faisal Shahzad, a newly naturalized citizen (great vetting job!), chose Times Square just because it's a powerful symbol and always crowded -- or if he also hoped to hit Viacom's headquarters as punishment for South Park's (promptly self-censored) lampoon of Mohammed.

This matters. South Park may not embody all that I admire about America, but its irreverence is an important manifestation of our freedom of expression. What politically correct and cowardly madness have we come to, when we allow murderous Muslim fanatics to censor our laugh lines?

I don't like gratuitous provocations directed at any religion. But freedom of speech applies: We can't have an anything-goes rule for every other faith, and a don't-touch rule for Islam.

When those Danish cartoons mocking Mohammed were first published several years ago, I found them tasteless, stupid and gratuitous. But the moment Islamist bullies reached into our civilization to threaten the cartoonists and publishers with death, we should have dug in our heels.

If the Saudis, or the Pakistanis, or the Iranians in their respective spiritual tenements don't want to watch South Park or look at cartoons of Mohammed, fine. They're entitled to their own house rules.

But they are not entitled to dictate to us what we can depict, describe or, yeah, laugh at. In our house, you have to play by our rules.

We should have taken a stand years ago. Now our appeasement-addicted administration won't. Comics will go on ripping up other faiths for their stand-up routines, but the religion that's spawned such ungodly terror will get a pass.

All of our self-censorship, bowing, kowtowing and apologizing has had no positive effect, whatsoever, on our enemies. Not one terrorist organization has disbanded, nor has one terrorist converted to the Malibu lifestyle.

The only thing we've done by caving in to every cultural demand from Islamist fanatics has been to encourage them to make more demands.

Our enemies believe we're cowards. We're also fools.

Ralph Peters' new book is "Endless War."

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

MIKE BLOOMBERG PULLS 180 DEGREE TURN ON POSSIBLE HOMEGROWN TERRORIST'S MOTIVES; WELL NOT REALLY...

Much has been written by my fellow bloggers about Shahzad and his thankfully incompetently executed bomb plot, so I will only touch on it peripherally, specifically in the context of how it was played by obnoxious Mayor-for-Life, Michael Bloomberg.

After learning that ICE, FBI and Police had arrested the Pakistan born Shahzad for the plot, Bloomberg said: "We will not tolerate any bias or backlash against Pakistani or Muslim New Yorkers."

Fine as far as it goes, but it seems Bloomie has an astonishingly short memory, in as much as only the night before he opined on Couric's broadcast that it was as likely as anything that it was a homegrown terrorist "angry at the health care Bill" who was responsible for the attempt.




Now the little twerp seems to suggest people angry at the Health Care Bill might also be angry enough at Shahzad that they would inappropriately target innocent Muslims and/or Pakistanis.


Note to Mikey: If you read this, try to grasp this single simple concept - Just because a great many people around the country oppose Obama's controlling agenda and are angry at both him and you alike for your control-freak propensities and political ambitions, it doesn't mean that we are unable to channel that anger appropriately and take it out on you and your political kin at the proper time and place; specifically in November at the ballot box.

Also discussing this: LeftCoastRebel (H/T).