Showing posts with label Jimmy Carter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jimmy Carter. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

News From The Obamaphate: REJOICE: Hope & Change Come to Egypt!

So, BOTUS has successfully jumped back in time to 1978 to closely study the blunders of the former WORST EVER President of the United States so he could soundly secure that title for himself. 

Congratulations PUTZ!
Egypt's next parliament to be led by Islamist

By Leila Fadel and Ingy Hassieb, Published: January 16

CAIRO — Liberals and Islamists in Egypt announced a temporary agreement Monday on a power-sharing plan that would install a Muslim Brotherhood leader as speaker of the country’s newly elected parliament.

Click the hyper-linked title above to read the whole story

Monday, September 5, 2011

News from the Obamaphate: Emulating Jimmy to Win in 2012

Back on the  January 31 of this year  I wrote a brief post titled "BOTUS Be Jimmy Carter, Version 10x" 

I don't pretend to be the least bit prophetic, rather, I think of myself as just a moderately good analyst of in the field of foreign affairs. It seems I was pretty much on target in my comparison of Obama as Jimmy Carter on ROIDS.

News from yesterday indicates that Islamist groups intend to transform the inchoate mess that is now Libya - thanks to Obama/Sarkozy/Cameron - into yet another Islamic fundamentalist enclave. Carter will forever be remembered as the President who lost Iran and who drove our economy into the ground.

Few alive and cognizant of world events at the time could have imagined any subsequent President being worse at his job than was Jimmih, but Obama has plainly trounced Carter's legacy as worst president ever. See, e.g. this from LL at Virtual Mirage.

Adding to the irony of Barack's Libya Policy comes news that BOTUS' Arab allies now consolidating power in Tripoli are rounding up blacks.

ONCE AGAIN: HECK OF A JOB, BARACK!

Thursday, February 17, 2011

News From The Obamaphate: Let's do the Time Warp Again....


Wish I had the photoshop skills to blend BOTUS into this outfit:


Source: Moonbattery

I guess that my lack of competency in that area kinda tells ya I'm one of the last of the
boomers.


What does THE ROCKY HORROR PICTURE SHOW have to do with the Obamaphate? Well, as I see it, this administration is becoming ever more like Dr. Frank N. Furter's dysfunctional and incompetent household of freaks. Some of you may remember that the main song of the cult classic is titled LET'S DO THE TIME WARP AGAIN.... Well, BOTUS et al are doing just that, by channeling Jimmi Cartah.

Read all about it here: U.S. to Rebuke Israel at U.N.

Monday, January 31, 2011

BOTUS Be Jimmy Carter, Version 10x

Comparisons between Barack Obama and Jimmi Cartah are of course nothing unusual. They've been made since shortly after Obama's inauguration. But now, with the events unfolding in Egypt, the full scope of the comparisons comes into sharp focus and the resulting image of Obama's weak and badly damaged presidency are both shocking and somewhat demoralizing.

With the full knowledge that I will be perceived by many as a useful idiot of the "Elders of Zion", I present this insightful piece by Aruf Benn of Israel's Haaretz newspaper:

Obama will go down in history as the president who lost Egypt

The street revolts in Tunisia and Egypt show that the United States can do very little to save its friends from the wrath of their citizens.

By Aluf Benn Tags: Israel news Egypt protests Middle East peace

Jimmy Carter will go down in American history as "the president who lost Iran," which during his term went from being a major strategic ally of the United States to being the revolutionary Islamic Republic. Barack Obama will be remembered as the president who "lost" Turkey, Lebanon and Egypt, and during whose tenure America's alliances in the Middle East crumbled.

The superficial circumstances are similar. In both cases, a United States in financial crisis and after failed wars loses global influence under a leftist president whose good intentions are interpreted abroad as expressions of weakness. The results are reflected in the fall of regimes that were dependent on their relationship with Washington for survival, or in a change in their orientation, as with Ankara.

America's general weakness clearly affects its friends. But unlike Carter, who preached human rights even when it hurt allies, Obama sat on the fence and exercised caution. He neither embraced despised leaders nor evangelized for political freedom, for fear of undermining stability.

Obama began his presidency with trips to Turkey, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, and in speeches in Ankara and Cairo tried to forge new ties between the United States and the Muslim world. His message to Muslims was "I am one of you," and he backed it by quoting from the Koran. President Hosni Mubarak did not join him on the stage at Cairo University, and Obama did not mention his host. But he did not imitate his hated predecessor, President George W. Bush, with blunt calls for democracy and freedom.

Obama apparently believed the main problem of the Middle East was the Israeli occupation, and focused his policy on demanding the suspension of construction in the settlements and on the abortive attempt to renew the peace talks. That failure led him to back off from the peace process in favor of concentrating on heading off an Israeli-Iranian war.

Americans debated constantly the question of whether Obama cut his policy to fit the circumstances or aimed at the wrong targets. The absence of human rights issues from U.S. policy vis-a-vis Arab states drew harsh criticism; he was accused of ignoring the zeitgeist and clinging to old, rotten leaders. In the past few months many opinion pieces have appeared in the Western press asserting that the days of Mubarak's regime are numbered and calling on Obama to reach out to the opposition in Egypt. There was a sense that the U.S. foreign policy establishment was shaking off its long-term protege in Cairo, while the administration lagged behind the columnists and commentators.

The administration faced a dilemma. One can guess that Obama himself identified with the demonstrators, not the aging dictator. But a superpower isn't the civil rights movement. If it abandons its allies the moment they flounder, who would trust it tomorrow? That's why Obama rallied to Mubarak's side until Friday, when the force of the protests bested his regime.

The street revolts in Tunisia and Egypt showed that the United States can do very little to save its friends from the wrath of their citizens. Now Obama will come under fire for not getting close to the Egyptian opposition leaders soon enough and not demanding that Mubarak release his opponents from jail. He will be accused of not pushing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hard enough to stop the settlements and thus indirectly quell the rising tides of anger in the Muslim world. But that's a case of 20:20 hindsight. There's no guarantee that the Egyptian or Tunisian masses would have been willing to live in a repressive regime even if construction in Ariel was halted or a few opposition figures were released from jail.

Now Obama will try to hunker down until the winds of revolt die out, and then forge ties with the new leaders in the region. It cannot be assumed that Mubarak's successors will be clones of Iran's leaders, bent on pursuing a radical anti-American policy. Perhaps they will emulate Turkey's prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who navigates among the blocs and superpowers without giving up his country's membership in NATO and its defense ties with the United States. Erdogan obtained a good deal for Turkey, which benefits from political stability and economic growth without being in anyone's pocket. It could work for Egypt, too.

Friday, October 9, 2009

NOBEL PEACE PRIZE COMMITTEE COMMITS CREDIBILITY HARA KIRI

Catchy title isn't it?

I wasn't planning on writing anything on Obama's win of the Nobel Peace Prize today given the extensive and mostly high quality of the coverage in the rational blogosphere (I'll link to some of these at the end of this post) but temptation got the better of me.

Actually I don't think that the NPP Committee (hereinafter "Committee") has in fact - with this award bestowal - committed ritual credibility suicide for the simple reason that one cannot commit suicide TWICE.

From my perspective the Committee's credibility demise dates back to its 1994 award of the prize to Yasser Arafat. Some readers of this blog (to the extent that any exist at all beyond my fifteen "official" followers) may have forgotten just what a venal monster Arafat was, so I'll do a short but hardly comprehensive re-cap of the crimes of this vicious little Nobel "Peace" Laureate.

Yasser Arafat formed Al-Fatah in 1959 and served as the Chairman of the PLO from 1969.

The PLO was an umbrella organization for several different radical Palestinian political/para-military terrorist organizations, of which Fatah was the largest.

Among the many terrorist activities attributable to the PLO over the years were:
Arafat wasn't just a terrorist, he was also an accomplished corruptocrat who kept his own people in abject poverty while diverting as much as $1 Billion Dollars to his personal accounts:

In August 2002, the Israeli Military Intelligence Chief alleged that Arafat's personal wealth was in the range of USD $1.3 billion,[92]. In 2003 the International Monetary Fund (IMF) conducted an audit of the PNA and stated that Arafat diverted $900 million in public funds to a special bank account controlled by Arafat and the PNA Chief Economic Financial adviser. However, the IMF did not claim that there were any improprieties, and it specifically stated that most of the funds had been used to invest in Palestinian assets, both internally and abroad.[93][94]

However in 2003, a team of American accountants–hired by Arafat's own finance ministry–began examining Arafat's finances; this team reached a different conclusion. The team claimed that part of the Palestinian leader's wealth was in a secret portfolio worth close to $1 billion, with investments in companies like a Coca-Cola bottling plant in Ramallah, a Tunisian cell phone company and venture capital funds in the US and the Cayman Islands. The head of the investigation stated that "although the money for the portfolio came from public funds like Palestinian taxes, virtually none of it was used for the Palestinian people; it was all controlled by Arafat. And none of these dealings were made public."[95


So, as I said before, the credibility of the Committee, at least from my perspective, is long dead. The subsequent awards of the prize to Jimmy Carter, the principle Western author of the brutal human rights abusing clerical regime ruling a now nuclear Iran; Al Gore, law school dropout, divinity school dropout and failed politician turned man-made global warming myth-huckster and snake oil salesman and now, Barack Obama, are just more dirt on the grave of the already credibility dead Committee. Or perhaps a better analogy: just more foul smelling gaseous emissions from the Committee's unburied rotting corpse.

Other rational blogs discussing this story:


Left Coast Rebel
SisterToljah
The Reaganite Republican
Not A Potted Plant
Michelle Malkin
Atlas Shrugs
Legal Insurrection
Hot Air
Track-a-'Crat