Ethical Conundrum for the "Tolerance" Fascists: 17 Afghans beheaded in insurgent attack on party

So who are America's Tolerant Left to support?  

The 17 murdered Afghans slaughtered for DANCING in violation of an injunction issued by some Taliban Mullah or the right of strict shariah following Muslims to freely express their faith by murdering non-conformists?

Its all here:  17 Afghans beheaded in insurgent attack on party

I'm betting the lefties side with the Taliban....

BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA ACCEPTS TALIBAN ROLE IN AFGHANISTAN

Word is out that BOTUS has announced a willingness to accept a role for the Taliban in Afghanistan's political structure. My immediate question is: in exchange for what? Not too many soccer stadium executions? A lead on Osama's whereabouts perhaps? We'll see... I will Update as information becomes available and as appropriate.

U P D A T E

from The American Pundit

White House: On Second Thought, The Taliban Isn’t Really An Enemy

by Stephan Tawney

Desperation. That’s the only way to describe this new talking point from the White House. According to them, the Taliban that’s been killing American soldiers isn’t really the enemy. In fact, the Obama Administration believes that the terrorist group has a positive role in Afghanistan’s future.

Why this new talking point? Obama doesn’t want to commit more troops to the war, as it would end up pissing off his far-left, anti-war base. So he’s trying to eliminate the enemy by pretending the enemy is no longer an enemy. We’re going to fight a war by pretending that the people we’re fighting are really good people we no longer need to fight. Smart power.

Click the linked Title above to read the whole post.