What a dishonest PRICK. Fabius is nothing more than a typical Socialist/Progressive VERMIN statist thief of others' hard-earned wealth.
French minister: 2015 climate deal must avoid US Congress
BONN, Germany
(AP) -- The global climate agreement being negotiated this year must be
worded in such a way that it doesn't require approval by the U.S.
Congress, the French foreign minister said Monday.
Laurent
Fabius told African delegates at U.N. climate talks in Bonn that "we
know the politics in the U.S. Whether we like it or not, if it comes to
the Congress, they will refuse."
If
negotiators follow his plan, that would exclude an international treaty
that has legally-binding limits on greenhouse gas emissions - something
some countries still insist on but which would have no chance of being
ratified by the Republican-controlled Congress.
"
We
must find a formula which is valuable for everybody and valuable for
the U.S. without going to the Congress," said Fabius, who will host the
U.N. climate summit in Paris in December where the new agreement is
supposed to be adopted. See the rest
HERE.
And WHY might they refuse Laurent???? Could it be because every single day we learn ever more information that makes it clear that AGW is in fact nothing more than a corrupt scheme invented and perpetuated by internationalist politicians and bureaucrats determined to steal wealth from those who create it so as to perpetuate your power-base through targeted bribery of social and professional constituents?
Our dear EPA chief wants low-information voters not to worry about such dumb stuff as proof, rather just trust the government when it comes to the science. Ha ha ha ha.
ReplyDelete....the public needs to trust how the EPA translates the “complicated” science into real-life actions
Complicated? Is that the same as nuanced? :-)
Well, it's not as if Earth's weather is subject to the output variaility of some nearby giant star or something. If such were the case, and the star were to cool, why Hell - we'd freeze over. And so would AGW "theory."
ReplyDelete